I don’t know how you can eat your cereals without choking with that mental prowess.

What do you think the book is adapting? The original Anne Frank’s diary. This is the same fucking story but with pictures. This is not the gotcha you think it is.

I won’t respond anymore because you are clearly just being a dumbass to make your argument look credible.

It doesn’t matter. You are trying to steer the conversation away from the subject.

I sure hope you go see your quack doctor when you are sick then, because modern medecine have bias.

Librarians are trained personnel explicitly for deciding what books are acceptable. The old Crusty Fuckfaces that want to ban anything and everything can become librarians themselves and decide for their school if they so wish.

But until then, they can read their bible and shut the fuck up.

If you want to go back to the dark ages, do so in the comfort of your own home and leave the society alone with your backwards beliefs.

I’m not sure why you keep referring to that dumb argument. There is two distinct book, I know that, but the second book is called the secret annex and is rewritten and more tame.

Otherwise, diary of a young girl is referred to as Anne Frank’s diary and all the other similar name. So shut the fuck up with your propaganda.

Neither book should be banned and for a right winger, you seem to be more about big government than personal responsibility that your ilk like to spout.

There is nothing offensive in the book and parents can decide for their child without being a bunch of christo-fascists cunts trying to ban anything they don’t like.

Walk the talk for once in your life and stop being an hypocrite. If you don’t mind toddlers shooting people and the mass shootings but you get your feelings hurt by a young girl describing what she is going through at puberty, there is no mental gymnastics that can justify that.

So go live in the wood with all your troglodytes so that you can live your christo-fascist life like you want. You can bring your bible with you, we don’t need it.

So Librarians have a bias, but not a board of old crusty people in a school district?

You are trying to fix a non-problem because some old christo-fascists cunts get their feelings hurt when they get told they are christo-fascists.

The article states first that a Texas district banned Anne Frank’s diary. Don’t play dumb.

Every fucking other countries don’t have mass shootings pretty much everyday. Only in the US. In Australia, when they banned gun ownership after a mass shooting in 1996, the shootings dropped drastically.

The school shootings are a multi-faceted problem which requires many changes, one of which is the gun culture.

There is a toddler every two weeks that shoot someone in the USA, how are guns not the problem?

You know where this doesn’t happen? Everywhere else in the world.

Ban guns for pretty much anything that is not hunting. Fund social services to provide quality mental health treatments to anyone that needs it. That should get you started in the right direction.

Because they somehow think the lying will benefit them and not the people they hate.

Predicting a republican’s reaction to any issue is easy because they are all grifters.

If it’s not happening often, why are you hellbent on banning books? They are edge case, but your ilk act like every school library is chuck full of inappropriate books.

Will each book be voted on individually? How does that work in your head? I doubt that people read minimally an excerpt of each book to decide and ban them.

Not really. Kids have active shooter drills, but you get your panties in a bunch because they might read Anne Frank?

You don’t really care about kids, you are just an hypocrite.

He’s swimming in the bank pools, he’ll be fine.

The loans are just so he can write that off.

People have always been this dense, it’s just that in the past, they were shamed for being bad people.

Now, they don’t hide their shittinest anymore because they found enough people to do the same.

Spoken like a true keyboard warrior.

You know for sure they will find a reason why they can’t live the walk.

And they are probably afraid that their wives will leave them because they are pieces of shit.

No, because they had a valid reason to get divorced, unlike everyone else.

Just like their abortion.

Thanks for the context and explanation. It is appreciated.

Maybe don’t throw your whistleblowers in a jail and let them rot for life, and you will avoid defections to another country.

Can you blame the guy to not want to die in a dark cell for showing the world that your own government is keeping a lot of tabs on you without your knowledge?

He tried to go to other countries, but none of them wanted to take him in except Russia because of what he knew.

So it’s either die in a cell in the US, or live a somewhat free man in Russia.

The choice is clear.

So demand that your government do better and get behind the people that shows you how your government fucks you over.

For a non-american, non-knowledgeable on gun person, I’ve seen the bump stock discussion a few times this week.

Why is it a discussion? What difference does a bumpstock do?

It’s always like that. When the only goal is more growth, the C-Suite will fuck everyone and anything over.

But people gotta eat and be homed, so that won’t change soon.

Do you think that traditional project management is from the top down? Or were you exposed to bad traditional project management? Because that’s the same argument that you are making for Agile.

Let’s make things clear - the Agile methodology is a great tool. But like any other tool, it is not a one size fits all. But what is happening right now is that it’s pushed by upper management because that’s the cool tool.