![](/static/253f0d9/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/db7182d9-181a-45e1-b0aa-6768f144911a.jpeg)
I don’t know if it says more about me, or more about trump that I almost thought this was a real quote.
I don’t know if it says more about me, or more about trump that I almost thought this was a real quote.
But the guy that slept through his own criminal trial will definitely not need a nap before/during the debate.
/s just in case
Somebody got called ‘psycho’ a lot in high school and is still salty about it.
Edit: TIL everyone on lemmy are fucking English majors.
Nah, everyone’s shitting on you cause you’re just the only one that doesn’t know how to take ten seconds for a Google search.
If only there was some kind of book, created decades ago, with a list of words, in alphabetical order, and what each word means in different contexts.
If only such a book was added to a worldwide database that anyone can access from any kind of computer, so that anyone can use it at any time.
To add to your statement: a few years ago, Henry Cavill went to Times Square in NYC wearing a shirt with the Superman S, and just hung out around signs for Man of Steel, and pretty much nobody recognized him (or if they did, they didn’t let it be known).
countryworld
Also, what a necromancer keeps their soul in so they can come back from death.
Kinda like Voldemort.
Using median makes it a loaded statistic skewed in favor of the minority (in this case, the wealthy).
Over half the country is living paycheck-to-paycheck, so that median number is already in the ‘well-off’ category by default, making them irrelevant to the main point of discussion.
Join unions, create unions
What if we’re in one of the sad states that has ‘right to work’ laws?
For those unaware, ‘right to work’ laws at exactly the opposite of how they sound. They outlaw (or at least restrict) union presence in their state, you know, so employers don’t have to deal with unions and can therefore do what they want with their labor force.
Can we actually just ban articles that use ‘slam’ in the title? Unless it’s two physical objects colliding? You know, actually slamming into each other?
I’m so fucking sick of this piece of garbage hyperbole.
In theory, the way the US was set up as a nation, the Judicial branch of the government and the Legislative branch are supposed to stop things like that from happening.
In practice, bribes talk better than speeches or facts.
“If” he’s guilty? Haaahahaha
Removed by mod
Grand Canyon
Implying that there’s only one side to fall off of? Nah man this timeline is literally Rainbow Road 250cc mirrored online. There’s no way to win cause the cheaters control the win ratio.
Likely to protect the cop/department too, since he shot at his own car that already had a disarmed, detained suspect inside. He very nearly killed someone that was already a non-threat. If the body cam footage got out it might make people think their cops are negligent or improperly trained! /ghasp
I can’t express the embarrassment I feel from how long it took me to understand this.
Not to dismiss the seriousness of the story, but the term, “rails against,” is as annoying as headlines that use “X slams Y.” It means nothing and is only there for the eye catch and click bait.
I know the point is to get peoples attention, but stuff like that only makes me roll my eyes and assume an idiot was in charge of the article.
Belugas are more closely related to dolphins, if I remember correctly. Sooo…
Until two separate accounts with authenticator/manager support don’t have any crossover.