It’s not like it matters anymore anyway. You want to believe that any politician has your best interests at heart, go ahead.

We have a king now.

Except “we tried” isn’t governing. It’s fucking about and looking busy.

I mean, the ruling is just hours old.

Then you’re not paying attention.

No, I am. It’s why I think they’re doing the bare minimum to say they tried. And the genocide that they’re supporting doesn’t benefit me in any way.

I think democrats, today, do try and govern.

I don’t.

Can you imagine?

He won’t, but honor has nothing to do with it. He’s a democrat and therefore unwilling to wield power he’s been given.

deleted by creator

Oh, now DWS still runs the DNC?

No. The party argued in court that if they wanted to, they could select their nominee in a smoke filled back room and ignore their charter.

But now they totally can’t because and only because Biden is supporting genocide for them and they don’t want him to stop.

“Both sides” people claim there are no important differences between the candidates or parties.

And it’s used by centrists as a catch-all strawman anytime someone complains about any specific issue in which there is little or no daylight between the parties.

But if they want to act like it’s ok to have a candidate that loses his train of thought during a debate, then suddenly it’s just fine because both candidates are like that.

Oh boohoo, my team didn’t win everything it wanted so I’m going to take my ball and go home.

Your team didn’t? Did Biden not move far enough to the right for you?

Still by far the most progressive president in my lifetime.

I see. He really isn’t far enough to the right for you. Well you should vote for him anyway. No matter who and all that.

Biden should have appointed someone better to head the DOJ, then.

deleted by creator

Until it doesn’t.

Democrats used to trust polls, too. Now they only trust them if they confirm existing biases.

Yeah, they’ve been uploading the back catalog to youtube. It’s nostalgic to see all the problems John Oliver went into depth over that still haven’t been addressed.

You’re always trying to say they are the same.

He says in the comments section of an article that was posted to justify overlooking Biden’s debate performance because Trump has similar evidence of cognitive decline.

“You’re just saying both candidates are the same!” to all criticism from the left is inconsistent with “Biden’s fine! See, both candidates are the same.”

Seems to me that the model has some blind spots.

She is, yes, but that wasn’t the question. The question was about name recognition, which Whitmer has.

I wouldn’t be great with Newsom, either, since he’s been moving to the right to appease the republican-adjacent wing of the party. But either would be an improvement over Biden, who in turn is still preferable to Trump.