Observe, the person demonstrating lgbt+ getting guns is the redline squirms.
Edit this is just like when Reagan stirred up sentiments against lawful black ownership of firearms in California (before he was president). How odd he didn’t raise concerns the year prior, or the year prior or the year prior
I’ve made my point, you haven’t addressed it.
You think you get to decide that THIS group doesn’t get to join the rest. The rest are already armed, and of course that’s a good discussion to have (reducing general gun violence.) But no, here’s where you want to argue.
🙄
I never said the general preservation of human life was what I was discussing. Of course I’d prefer no one die at all.
I’d also prefer immigrants, lgbt+, and others wouldn’t be hunted for who they are.
I clearly highlighted that an at risk group is trying to empower themselves due to the impending risk from actual threats made publicly against them.
Who am I (or you) to tell those folks they are in the wrong to reach for whatever tools they can access? (Be it speech, political action, or indeed self defence)
IM not worried (or therefore the actor in your suggested paranoid imaginings), because I’m not a member of a target group. The trick is I can empathize with their position, and I can recognize that although I’m not in a target group now, I sure could be in the future.
For those reasons I would never get in the way of folks defending themselves, especially when this group is interested in training and safe practices.
The people who “take priority” are those in harm’s way, and we aren’t the ones to tell them how to live right now, there hearing MORE them enough of that as it is
Pretty cool suggesting at risk groups should stay vulnerable when their enemies are armed.
Interesting position you’re taking.
General gun violence is unlike targeted political violence against minorities, so things like school shooting and gang violence stats mean nothing.
Comparing to Japan is irrelevant as there isn’t an armed and empowered group publicly discussing hunting at risk folks there.
“if your position is that you CHOSE a job that makes you work on MLK Day, that makes you a dumber worker”.
Gaza holds no water, kushner and Jr were on record for seeking to build condos in gaza once it was “cleared out”
Gaming is alive and well. It’s just the media you are consuming.
Spiderman pointing meme
Doin hard R’s in chat. Super cool
Edit downvotes be a bunch of ableist mf’s
It’s whatever you put in the playlist. There’s no surprises
Source please? I’d like to share the poll stats with a friend
Omg all the gamer victims how could you think of the gamers they’ve been RAMMED on the INTERNET
If you are interested in content on massive sci Fi governments, consider reading foundation.
Despite some of its issues, it taps the topic of “how do massive organizations survive and morph, and possibly betray their own original mission” very well.
Ultimately this is just a problem of anyone listening to trash on the Internet.
Imane earned her spot and her podium. The Olympics and other organizations have stuff set up to ensure fair competition. No one should care for a second what alphawolf69 thinks on the topic.
I’m not diluting the current issue. It’s very important. But society should shift to stop considering bigots on Twitter as important discourse.
What’s the plan op? Do you really think you’re gonna diversify opinion or change minds by being this combative in a thread you started, and had to have known was a spicy topic to begin with?
There are meaningful discussions to be had on the general topic but I don’t think your approach was very effective
Interview fast. Leave without notice. (Drop your equipment off of course).
The company is actively harming you. You don’t have to be nice as you get away
The content about the reasons for different smiles is cool. And the highlighting of the training data influencing things is also good stuff.
But as far as realistic image generation based on culturally relatable smiling sounds like a skill issue. You can’t just generate images about specific times or settings or people with “defaults”. You have to specify your prompt.
Agree. Teenagers or the otherwise immature wish for this because it feels like some sort of vengeance or something. An exertion of will…
But the real deal is not wanting political violence at all.
In a perfect system, the pardon is meant to be a “check” on the powers of the other branches. (Legislative and judicial). Each branch is meant to both support AND check the others.
Obviously we are watching it all unwind. Certain things were a “gentleman’s agreement” in that a president normally wouldn’t over do it and just pardon tons of people. We are finding out lots of things were just assumed to be ok, but are easily abused by bad actors