Lev_Astov

There are manual releases on each door inside, but I’m surprised they don’t have them outside as well.

Reading more about it, I find that many only have manual releases on the front doors until recently and they have a connection point you’re meant to jump with power to unlock and open from the outside. I didn’t think anyone would be okay waiting for a jump to get their baby out, but then these people waited for firemen to break their window, so…

Maybe not skip them, but instead play something else over top of them like another video you like, a music segment, or cat videos.

I don’t know about you, but what I learned is we’ll build our own Youtube with blackjack and hookers.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BonScdt0-Sc

It sounds like it’s their insurance company that is handling the thing and their first action was to fight instead of settle. If AA really wanted to send the right message to the public with this announced backtracking, they’d have announced that they’d just dropped their previous insurance company in favor of one that’s not completely insane.

They’re so brave.

What ever happened to doing this with UHF RFID? Getting the cost of the individual chips down was always just a matter of scaling production.

Human error is a far more reasonable explanation than complicated conspiracies, but I understand the thought. It really looked like that ship aimed for the bridge. Planning such a conspiracy would be far, far harder and more expensive to pull off than simple bridge failure, though.

Believe it or not, the insurance companies drive maritime safety requirements since they hate having to pay out for things like this. The classification societies that regulate and inspect ships to approve for insurance coverage have very strict and well thought out safety requirements that get better any time a new failure mode is discovered.

I personally think this one was human error in an emergency situation.

Theory: They lost primary electric service and began a slight drift to starboard. When they got backup power online, they began a crash reverse to slow down. This would hinder rudder control since the ship was still going forward and now just creating turbulence with the prop. Reverse would torque the stern to port, swinging the bow to starboard, as we saw. The bow thruster was offline due to the power issues.

Five comments down, maybe, but I’ll take what we can get.

Do people really not appreciate simple trolling around here anymore? Everyone’s acting like they think this is serious, and that’s the most disturbing part.

Not with any pci-e expansion sockets. I’m not even sure it could address a proper pci-e GPU.

That would be pretty impressive, actually.

Always buy used. https://www.allsurplus.com/

These are the kinds of people who go on the Internet and claim that dishwashers don’t work very well.

Remember kids, if you’re not paying for the service you get from a large company, you aren’t their customer, you’re their product.

deleted by creator

As he said, that only works if the device is on, which would be really odd in a car. I’m not aware of any that keep comms on in sleep, since those are typically high power draw.

How is it hard to root for the anonymity of people? This is pretty cut-and-dry.

tbf, if the guy was a Chinese communist, it’d have to be secret, I guess.