Nah, it forces them to sell over the ten years, since if they wait up until the last moment, the market’s gonna get flooded, meaning they’ll have to lower prices to be competitive
Nah, it forces them to sell over the ten years, since if they wait up until the last moment, the market’s gonna get flooded, meaning they’ll have to lower prices to be competitive
They would probably have issues with publishers if you actually owned the titles.
It’d probably make them very heavily liable if for some reason Steam shut down, they had to make something unavailable for some reason, whatever.
It’s illegal if the fact that a service fee would be added wasn’t shared before ordering (on the menu / by the waiter /…)
AirVPN
Knife, scissors, stuff like that probably
Worst case, they can keep chugging along without any changes, except maybe stopping the donation “nag”.
It’s honestly kinda perplexing.
Everyone keeps talking about taxing the rich but when someone offers to give a nonprofit we all love a billion dollars it’s suddenly the worst thing on the planet.
If the deal were real of course
Honestly, they’d be stupid not to take it.
Imagine how much you could do with a billion. It’d perpetually sustain the organization, it’d allow them to hire translators and writers, resulting in better content for all of us.
Hell, I’d take it, and 99.9% of people on this planet would too.
Yes, pure html pages are so much better and nicer to use!
Hell yeah
hypocrites?
What a deranged conclusion
It being a status symbol becomes kind of irelevant if every other person has it
They do, unfortunately
So much better
Consider the alternative
Source for the revenue? Was only able to find figures in the $50-70bil range.
Profit $20-30bil.
Do you understand the case enough to make a more accurate judgement based on the relevant laws? I don’t, but believe that the court does.
There’s a big difference between “heated” and “burnt” tobacco. Same as with weed vaporization vs smoking, vaporization is much healthier compared to inhaling burnt plant material.