![](/static/253f0d9/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/db7182d9-181a-45e1-b0aa-6768f144911a.jpeg)
Technically true, but if you can be kicked for no reason, you can be kicked for any reason.
Technically true, but if you can be kicked for no reason, you can be kicked for any reason.
Seems like some third-party hosting is in order to support any Rebellion Russians.
Then you should know better.
I agree with you mostly, and thank you for giving such a passionate and important response.
The problem is not the people though. Placing the “blame” or responsibility on the victims of this invasive behaviour is not the correct conclusion. These settings are deliberately obfuscated and people are uneducated on privacy and how it relates to technology. This is not their fault. Life is far too complicated to place yet another burden on the individual who already has so much to think about. The change needs to come from the people, yes, but it is not the people who need to change.
Of course they do.
I can certainly see that argument, but I’d counter that eventually the Musk bubble will pop and that day is coming like a freight train. Better to ditch him now while they can than suffer the cost of keeping him.
Of course it is.
we virtually never deploy our military domestically
Doesn’t sound like you’d need to if the cops are running around with that kind of fire power in their cars.
You’re not. Jetbrains users are just a lot more vocal. It’s like vegans or people who vape. They will let you know 😉
Depends on their style of emotional investment I guess. Not all romantic relationships are sexual, so physical intimacy isn’t necessarily required. So it reasonably could be the same emotional attachment to the AI as it would be for a real person. Whether or not that is healthy is an entirely different topic, but having a virtual boyfriend is very possible.
Unless I am missing something the deep fakes of Taylor Swift wouldn’t actually be covered then 😄
It’s a meme, it’s not actually saying not to use async:
Yeah, this screams ArcaneOS 2.0
It’s fine as long as you have proper source control. Run it and check the diff before committing.
It is wrong to sell addictive substances to addicts.
Sure, adults have the right to smoke if they want. They are, of course, adults. But that doesn’t make it okay for tobacco companies to advertise harmful and addictive substances to anyone, least of all the people who are already addicted.
The individual responding isn’t the issue. They haven’t made any decision to respond like this, they are following a script.
The script is written by people who should know exactly what they are doing, so the result is either malice or negligence. Either way it’s unacceptable where the law is concerned.
This image reminds me of a junior dev who used fixed position for everything because he “couldn’t make it look like the picture otherwise”.
In JS a Boolean has 4 states.
true
false
undefined (where the key is set to undefined)
undefined (where the key doesn’t exist on the object)
if (obj.value === true) {
console.log(1);
} else if (obj.value === false) {
console.log(2);
} else if ("value" in obj) { // key "value" is in the obj, but it is set to undefined
console.log(3);
} else { // key "value" is not in object
console.log(4);
}
You’re welcome.
since many site owners are uncomfortable running mystery code on our servers
And yet Node.js exists and flourishes.
Yeah. We were there! Or close enough… It was a glorious week where everything lined up perfectly… Then we overshot and we are in this clusterfuck of nonsense.