aroom

He is not relevant

deleted by creator

he surely knows the tech. what’s concerning is how he’s blocking anyone trying to contribute to work on it if it doesn’t fit his agenda. very concerning and self centred. a total waste.

unfortunately he’s not one of the interesting co-author of the protocol. too self centred.

define these people. define these instances. etc etc

what’s your point? anyone can do a screen shot and share it too.

if you want to have a conversation about the content of my post, please keep it on topic : without authorised fetch and a domain blocked at the instance level, the content is pushed.

if you have technical knowledge to add to this or can correct me about the protocol I’m glad to hear it. if not I’m not interested.

Yes and that’s their right.

But thankfully they don’t impose anything to anyone. You had me worried for a minute.

where did you see that the fedipact main purpose was to impose defederation? that would be rich.

I came to the fediverse in 2017, so nothing to do with reddit or meta or twitter.

The fact is here, we have a choice. So you do you.

On mastodon I have an account on an instance that blocked meta and is using authorised fetch (so the proper way to block a domain) : great, my content won’t go there or on any other blocked domains : it’s my choice.

I have another account on another instance that didn’t blocked meta : great, my content will be shared with threads users and I will be able to browse threads.

Choice, isn’t it great?

protecting your content from being pushed to an instance that you though your blocked.
protecting your content from being shared where you though it won’t because of the way things are worded.

yes, on Mastodon when a user block an instance, it’s more like a mute than a block. Your posts will still be available to them, but you won’t see their content.

The only solution if you want to protect your content from being shared on an instance is to block it at the instance level AND that the instance use Authorised Fetch.

Not all instances have this feature on.

Apple Music pays two time what Spotify does. Easy pick between the two.

I’ve read that it doesn’t have e2ee in its specs. Google has a proprietary tweak enabling it but Apple will stick to RSC specs.

Let’s hope that RSC gets e2ee asap.

https://mastodon.social/@daringfireball/111421851053569842

I guess if you enable it on your device you are safe, but if your content is on another device that doesn’t enable it (it’s an opt in option), your content will be available.

I don’t like the idea to blame a system instead of the people directly responsible for this decision at Reddit. it’s like they are victim of it of capitalism and couldn’t make another decision.

even under capitalism, Reddit could have found another solution. they could have milked third party app by bringing a slightly unfair price. blaming capitalism is too easy and in my book, often used by individuals to distance themself from their own responsibility. like the classic “they are no ethical consumption user capitalism, thus I can consume whatever I want it’s not my fault it’s the system. bad system, bad.”

you can’t blame every personal comportement to capitalism. it’s to easy.

edit: so you’ll downvote instead of argue. no wonder why blaming is your way to go.