![](/static/253f0d9/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/8f2046ae-5d2e-495f-b467-f7b14ccb4152.png)
Texas, actually. Some sections of highway are 85 mph.
Texas, actually. Some sections of highway are 85 mph.
No, that’s not what the issue was. The stimulus was a drop in the bucket, and I think it’s insane to talk like people “have more money now” because they got a check for like a thousand dollars 4 years ago. That shit was gone the week after it was given, probably to rent in most cases.
The price increases were blamed on supply chain issues, which did exist, but not to the degree that could justify the increase.
…a global pandemic? That excuse let them raise prices far beyond their actual cost inflation.
Imagine making a statement like this while also calling us ”state department“ and “nsa”.
Take your lies and hypocrisy elsewhere.
What’s the matter, English not your first language? They miss that particular idiom in your training?
You’re right, I was confused. That’s partially because your comment implied the US targeted him specifically, which was the case for the father but not for the son.
You also appear confused, since you refer to him as a “dissident”.
It’s tragic, but maybe don’t hang out with a bunch of terrorists. His father is to blame for taking his son into that company.
Are you really calling al-Awlaki a “dissident”? What a load of crap, dude was straight up al-Qaeda! We didn’t “label” him a terrorist, he was one.
I was so shocked when Trudeau publicly implicated the Indian government. They really must have solid proof of it for him to do so.
Nobody is taking your stove you absolute waste of air. Some of us prefer to understand the risks vs benefits, and studies like this are informative.
Sure, and is that what they voted to criminalize? Or was it actually just criticism of the state of Israel?
You’ll be downvoted again, but it’s more that you’re an ass than your being wrong. I’m going to go out on a limb and guess you were being a dick last time too.
While the boy admitted to sharing photos, it also said they didn’t find any so there may have been a lack of evidence for that.
Are you admitting that you’re the same person on two accounts? That’s really pathetic you know. Can’t your ideas stand on their own?
Why the new account? Did you get banned for being a vicious bigot on your last one?
Anyone who disagrees with me is transphobic! It’s obviously not possible for me to be wrong!
Calm down. And no, there has not been a “ton” of evidence. So far I’ve seen a grand total of one actual study, and it’s a very small one.
Can’t wait for the civil war at this point.
EDIT: ah the bloodthirsty have come here
I guess the hypocrisy is lost on you. Frankly I’m inclined to believe you’re a right wing troll trying to make trans people look bad at this point.
4 people vs one *
*corrected your obviously good faith error