![](/static/253f0d9/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/8f2046ae-5d2e-495f-b467-f7b14ccb4152.png)
I don’t think rural towns are depopulating due to hate or discrimination… it’s mostly because of job prospects, no?
I don’t think rural towns are depopulating due to hate or discrimination… it’s mostly because of job prospects, no?
Owning a horse is more expensive monthly than having a drug addiction tbh.
CSS wouldn’t be used to spy on your network traffic; if they wanted your internet data, they’d have much simpler methods to collect it than CSS (and they wouldn’t be able to decode most of that data anyways in normal cases).
or who I am accessing it from
What do you mean by that?
Suggesting that a VPN could mitigate stuff relating to CSS is like wearing a floating vest 24/7 when flying in a Boeing plane: you might feel a bit safer with it on, but it’d probably be smarter to have a parachute instead.
A VPN won’t really do anything against CSS/IMSI catchers.
It’s unconstitutional to deny a US citizen entry to the US. It’s the same in most other countries. But it still happens in many countries; Sweden for example has had a lot of problems deporting convicted criminals to their homelands, because their homeland refuses to accept them back.
most secure
Yeah because it’s really secure anyone can take out your cash via ACH or whatever by your account numbers on that piece of paper.
your account is still protected by the bank for any fraud
Your bank is required to investigate and such, yeah? And you will most likely get your money back - after a while - if their investigation determines it was fraudulent. But a long process that’d be avoided by having a safer electronic transfer system. And what will you do if the bank thinks it’s some friendly fraud?
Not worth it. I don’t even like direct debit. No one should initiate taking money from my account other than myself.
This was from the 80s.
But yes, they do that nowadays… but viral loads can be so small that it won’t be detected on a test, but will likely infect the patient. So don’t give blood if you’re unsure.
I would have thought OP wanted an achievement in The Stanley Parable (5 years without playing), but they’d need to redo their math in that case…
Where did I say otherwise? If you’re able to go to a normal licenced shop and buy it, of course the example I gave wouldn’t happen.
When you gotta hang out with people (who most likely do/sell other drugs), no risk that you’re going to get an offer to try something else.
But the partition is Microsoft’s own, basically no one has ever touched it themselves. So why can’t they do some housecleaning to make enough space? At the very least, they could fix the error messages to be more descriptive on how to fix it.
The tin-foil in me says it’s just a tactic to get people to switch to Windows 11. “Oh, I have errors with my updates? I should really try upgrading and see if that fixes it, I don’t want any hackers to steal my megabytes…”
Why should wire fraud give such a harsh punishment?
Perpetual growth/engagement statistics?
I think that most smokers don’t even like menthols. When I used to smoke, and someone would ask to bum a cigarette from me, I’d always say “sure, but they’re menthols” and the majority of the time they would decline.
it was only car insurance
Aha, I forgot the thread’s title and just assumed it was home insurance if it differs that much. The new neighborhood had higher incidence of vandalism maybe, or historically many bad drivers? But yeah, I’d probably risk that as well; a car is mobile, so no reason to have such a huge difference. Would never risk renters/home insurance though.
I would keep my address there on insurance forms
I’m not sure I’m understanding. You were living at place B, but your insurance was registered to place A? Wouldn’t the insurer then deny any claims if something were to happen at place B?
All those services block IPVanish and Proton. They want my data not my money.
How do you come to that conclusion from their blocking of commercial VPNs? Sure, of course they want your telemetry as well, but it’s mainly due to the copyright owners/distribution agreements.
And Russia was a signatory to the Budapest Memorandum. What’s your point?
As if they’d write something like that? I think it’s more likely they’ll just show a higher price as if it’s the normal base price and hope people don’t notice or care.
Good that the settlement was rejected then. Passing card fees onto the end-customer doesn’t fix the problem.