![](/static/253f0d9/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/8f2046ae-5d2e-495f-b467-f7b14ccb4152.png)
Random Internet commenter so desperate to hate Democrats he has to go after donors challenge: Super Possible.
Random Internet commenter so desperate to hate Democrats he has to go after donors challenge: Super Possible.
OK so now there’s corruption in checks notes, trying to obey the letter of the law. Interesting.
I made my comment 2 minutes before yours so it’s wild to me that you read the real reason and still threw a fit with that wall of text. Y’all just live on outrage, huh?
This dude owns way more than just a few Panera bread and he was literally just trying to follow the law and even so he decided to go ahead and pay them anyways even though according to the lawyers, he probably could have gotten away with it but you’re right bOtH SiDeS ArE tHE sAmE
That is unfortunate. Absolute red meat for both-sides-are-bad politics.
Only if you really want it to be.
The real reason was because the law was specifically tailored for fast food, so to protect bakeries and other places it had the clause about the bread.
The law defines what a fast-food restaurant is, and says it is not an establishment that “operates a bakery that produces for sale on the establishment’s premises bread."
The donor was just confused if that meant him, ultimately he decided it probably did but that he’d pay them anyways.
But yeah this is totally the same thing as trump being friendly with Russia.
It states why in the article.
I hope you get a chance to watch the sun set later, bro.
Same, my daughter wanted their fries recently and we caved and bought it, and it was actually quite juicy and tasty.
Ironically the fries were undercooked soggy potatoes, so win some lose some I guess.
I believe 8 states still have “unenforceable” laws preventing atheists from holding office. Kinda wild.
Haven’t you heard? They’re called “Digital Nomads” now.
….that’s a very large sample size and way more than enough for accuracy.
I don’t understand how hard it is to not go out in public wearing staggeringly polarizing political opinions on your chest.
Like, ok, you think Zionism is hawt, but why tf would you want to so proudly tell everyone that?
People are fucking weird.
“Use SNAP benefits and get a job” -Jesus, apparently.
No shit. Saudi is an American puppet state
lol wut…fuck I wish that were true, but they definitely have their own interests in mind and not ours (USA), no clue where you people get this stuff but bless your hearts.
…from Spotify going bankrupt, they definitely would stop getting money from Spotify, though, which is clearly what we’re talking about.
Yeah they would cease to exist.
And then nobody gets anything, not even the guys just running a white noise playlist, and making money off of it.
They paid a freelance photographer for pictures because that’s pretty much all they do.
The photographer may be a terrorist douchebag, but if he’s got pictures of spider-man then we’re all gonna still want to see them.
Happy for everyone else but I just got mine like a year ago! Fuckity fuck fuck!
This entire article is about them discovering issues during simulations and then fixing them before deploying to the streets.
So if your attempt is genuinely to question their intentions then it should be very obvious what those intentions are.
The only person being hyperbolic is you acting like a shill for this company
Stating facts from the article and being reasonable is hyperbole?
Even before GM, Cruise has been using their vehicles on public roads since 2020. How many kids has it killed since then?
The answer is precisely zero.
Over that same period human drivers killed about 528 pedestrian children.
Now “foul!” You may cry, as the data is for national averages versus isolated incidents, to which I would both agree and point out that Cruise has been operating in 13 major metropolitan cities now.
“Well that’s all fine and dandy, money_loo, but just you wait until the day they hit and kill a kid!”
Which just brings us back to the entire point of the article, how they are doing everything they can to insure that, y’know, their cars never hit any kids…
Did you even read the article?
We’ve just got another extremely misleading technology hating title here.
In its statement, Cruise said, “It is inaccurate to say that our AVs were not detecting or exercising appropriate caution around pedestrian children” — a claim undermined by internal Cruise materials reviewed by The Intercept and the company’s statement itself. In its response to The Intercept’s request for comment, Cruise went on to concede that, this past summer during simulation testing, it discovered that its vehicles sometimes temporarily lost track of children on the side of the road. The statement said the problem was fixed and only encountered during testing, not on public streets
So they found out during internal testing that children were sometimes being identified as adults. That’s it. It wasn’t missing kids entirely, and it never endangered a single one. They recognized a problem during testing and fixed it, meanwhile in the three months of testing to bug fix it, about 25 kids under 14 were killed by human drivers.
But whatever, just more fear mongering and hyperbole from Lemmy!
Yes, he is catholic. Yes, most Catholics disagree with abortion. No, Biden doesn’t think his religious beliefs should dictate how women live their lives. He literally says it plain as day for even the very stupid among us to understand. Good luck!
https://apnews.com/article/abortion-biden-2024-reproductive-rights-harris-494af752992ba88fa6e3d53fbd54f716