Well, it’s one thing to say an ‘artificial agent’ looks at someone’s work on deviant art and learns from it. It’s another to use that to make money, as I personally can’t imagine many of the posters would have been on board with that.

Yeah, but anything you create automatically has a copyright, so for example this comment is not in the public domain. Its use is limited to the context I am using it in; that is, I expect it to be copied for federation purposes, but I wouldn’t say that AI is covered in this context, just genuine readership, moderation, and bots that are ‘part of the community’.

At least that’s the EU stance afaik. Like if I saw this comment on a billboard somewhere I’d see that as a clear breach of copyright and even privacy.

Properly sized carton box, “Aww hell yeah!”

Disturbing the lichens on stonehenge vs generating awareness is clearly connected, since it grabbed our attention without millions of euros of advertising.

Dude wtf this is Lemmy not Reddit can we just keep it friendly?

If it’s a belief then I am definitely vegan

You think it’s confusing if I say I I’m half vegan half vegetarian?

deleted by creator

I’m mostly vegan

Yeah I definitely understand your perspective. I’m equal parts vegetarian, pescetarian, and vegan. But I’m not planning on skipping the fish just yet. It’s linked to my heritage.

They are climate activists so I imagine climate change is one of the two evils. The other one is potentially upsetting the lichens and people’s feelings.

You might not agree with their decision, but I don’t find it irrational.

The title is definitely misleading. The article does mention that it’s not spray paint though, and that it could impact the lichen.

Yes, or are you saying that art from that time can’t look like AI art?

I’m not deep into that specific topic, I just brought it up as a large environmental action to show that these things do happen and are not as visible as you might imagine.

That being said I think there are different perspectives. As far as I understand it the factory was built without good justification, and it has a negative impact on the environment.

I didn’t imply it, I explicitly started with that.

You might not believe that all attention is good attention, but can you imagine that some people do see it that way? In fact I’ve seen a docu about a photographer who believes disruption is the only way to get people’s attention.

Yes, what else?

I think it’s based on the idea that all attention is good attention, and you pick the lesser of two evils.

What you are suggesting is already the case, but it tends be be less visible. For example did you know about this?

I love iron maiden but I does anybody else feel this picture looks like AI art?

I’m not sure but I do know that my consent is worth more than my privacy.