• xantoxis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      145
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      He can do that by officially assassinating the conservative SC justices, nominating new ones, and then having armed marines inside the senate comittees to ensure they are confirmed immediately.

      There’s probably a few more steps, but this would get us back on track. He would have to be willing to give up his powers at a certain point, which means installing the legal apparatus (in the form of government officials) with the will to strip those powers.

      • Fester@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        146
        ·
        2 months ago

        Justice: “Don’t kill me, it’s illegal!”

        Assassin: “I’m on orders from the president.”

        Justice: “Oh, well, go ahead then.”

      • SkybreakerEngineer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        67
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        Ah yes, the classic play in which you acquire unchecked power, exercise it to get rid of all your political rivals, then somehow use it to restore democracy. Occurs once in an anime about giant robots and psychic powers, and never in history.

      • Makeitstop@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        The next steps would be ordering the justice department to prosecute him, going to court, and appealing all the way to the new Supreme Court so they can overturn the precedent. Which would require either moving very quickly or preventing the other side from taking power, one way or the other.

        Of course, by then pandora’s box is open. As long as someone is willing to follow those kinds of orders, nothing would prevent the next president from doing the same thing. It’s a slippery slope not unlike the one that caused Rome to go from being a republic that viewed regicide as a fundamental virtue to an empire that would persecute groups for denying the divinity of the emperor.

        • btaf45@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          57
          ·
          2 months ago

          Of course, by then pandora’s box is open. As long as someone is willing to follow those kinds of orders, nothing would prevent the next president from doing the same thing.

          It would be a genius move for Biden to arrest Trump right now as a terrorist enemy combatant, but give hints that he’s doing this because of the supreme court ruling. And then in order to be prosecuted, the Supreme Court would need to completely reverse this ruling and restore democracy. Even if Biden went to prison after a total reversal of the ruling, he would be regarded by history as a saviour of the country on par with Lincoln.

          • dudinax@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            That’d be fine, but simplest move for Biden is to install Hunter as Veep, then have Hunter declare Joe the winner of the election next January. When Joe kicks the bucket a few months later, the presidency gets handed down from father to son as God intended.

  • EatATaco@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    149
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    2 months ago

    People are getting this all wrong.

    They haven’t crowned the POTUS as king. They were very clear that non-official acts are not covered. They’ve crowned themselves, the ones who get to determine what is and what is not an “official act” the kings.

    • massacre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      94
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Did you read the fucking dissent? That’s a sitting SC Justice saying that quote, not some arm chair IANAL basement dweller:

      “When he uses his official powers in any way, under the majority’s reasoning, he now will be insulated from criminal prosecution. Orders the Navy’s Seal Team 6 to assassinate a political rival? Immune. Organizes a military coup to hold onto power? Immune. Takes a bribe in exchange for a pardon? Immune. Immune, immune, immune,” Sotomayor wrote.

      If one of the dissenting justices thinks it likely, we better pay attention. The whole “They were very clear that non-official acts are not covered.” is a pillar built on sinking sand - what defines non-official becomes subjective real fast. Biden could assassinate every conservative justice on SCOTUS and get his own in there to make it all legal. Threats of the same to any in congress who won’t play ball.

      And if someone can’t imagine Biden doing it (I can’t), I’m thinking that there are quite a few citizens who believe Trump abso-fucking-lutely would pull that shit. With a majority on SCOTUS already he could just start going after political rivals and keep SCOTUS themselves in check with threats of the same. If SCOTUS has done anything they’ve painted themselves in a corner and only Congress can unfuck us with impeachment (as unlikely as that seems!)

      • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        30
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I read their point as being “because official acts are not defined and they’re the ultimate deciders, the Court can provide or withhold this immunity at will”. Turns out killing Republicans is not an official act and killing Democrats is.